How deregulation can become overregulation: An empirical study into the growth of internal bureaucracy when governments take a step back
Kristine Vedal StørkersenProsjektdeltager
Over the past decades, government safety management regulation has been driven by deregulation, simpliﬁcation and organization-level regimes of inspection. So-called functional rule-making requires organizations to implementsafetymanagementsystemsappropriatefortheiroperations.Theparadoxthatseemstohavearisenis thatoverregulation is commoninmany organizations. Research hasfoundover-proceduralization, safety clutter, bureaucratic overload, and procedures not at the service of safety.
To explore the paradoxical relationship between governmental deregulatory measures and organizational overregulation, we analyze empirical data from Norwegian ﬁsh farming and coastal transport. The data conﬁrms that practitioners experience a rapidly grown abundance of internal rules and protocols, ill-ﬁtting procedures, and pervasive, exaggerated safety management. We trace three mechanisms that have driven internal overregulation: work auditability; managerial insecurity and liability; and audit practices. These mechanisms show how functional regulation can have unintended consequences when it meets other accountability expectations.
Expectations of market doctrine, bureaucratic entrepreneurism and control can lead a company transforming simple governmental regulations into vastly overcomplicated safety management systems. We conclude our study with prescriptions of how this aspect of safety could be done diﬀerently.